Hikite is a Japanese term meaning, literally, "pull hand."
Some instructors will say that a punch, strike or block is not effective if not properly using the pulling hand on the other side of the torso; perhaps for balance, perhaps for added rotational power. Some will say that the pull represents an actual pull; pulling the opponent into the attack.
Regardless of what reasons are given, hikite has its functions. I believe, however, that there are some holes in a few of the more common theories.
Pulling the opponent in
Ever try to pull someone while you are punching? Not that easy, is it? Especially not for a smaller person to do to a larger person, as a self-defense situation might warrant. More practical might be the idea that the "pulling hand" is stabilizing the opponent while the punching/striking arm moves into the target. Following this idea, try catching the opponent's arm with one hand and punching or striking with the other. Instead of actually pulling back with the non-punching/striking arm, simply anchor yourself to the opponent at that point. In relation to the "push" of the other arm, this arm seems to "pull." In actuality, that arm doesn't really move much, but does inhibit the opponent's movement, particularly his ability to pull his arm back. Your "counter-pull" may end up canceling out his movement, more than anything else.
Power
Hikite adds power through timing with the hip rotation? Ha! Maybe I'll write another entire article on this subject sometime in the future. The pull of the arm does not really create more power in basic techniques as performed from static stances. Although it can help when using some non-basic stepping patterns, including some kinds of shifting and stepping. I will discuss one such pattern below.
Hikite adds power through coordinated tension? Not really. The idea of tensing various body parts to make a stronger technique is very good. But not all the muscles need to be tensed. In fact, the tensing of some muscles can actually make a technique slower and weaker. Tension in the pull-hand may not detract from the power of the technique, but it may not add anything to it, either. See my 3/99 article for more on this subject. The muscles to tense are those located between the base of support (from the feet, where support from the floor is initiated, up through the hips) and the target (through the attacking limb into the opponent). If this "connection stream" does not include the pulling arm, why tense it?
Balance
"For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction." Pulling one side of the body helps propel the other side forward…right? Not in basics. This will be discussed further in a future article.* Balancing the "pull" with the "push" doesn't really make much sense for most basic techniques.
Efficiency
Maybe it makes for a stronger technique somehow. Maybe it also makes for a good start for a big follow-up technique. But we do lose something when pulling back the non-punching/striking/blocking arm. That arm is then out of the way and less able to block/cover the opponent's attack. It also takes that arm longer to move forward again to apply an additional technique. There are tradeoffs when using a large pull-back of the arm. As long as these trade-offs are understood, there is nothing wrong with its practice. I see a big hikite action to have advantages and disadvantages, depending on the situation.
Example of good use of hikite
Here is one example of how I believe a large, forceful hikite action can benefit the overall technique:
Start with the left foot forward in a front or free stance. As the opponent comes straight towards you, step back with the left foot and continue the step around such that your left foot ends about 45 degrees off to the right side. At the same time, perform a kizamizuki (jab) or uraken-uchi (backfist-strike) with the right arm, pulling the left hand back to your left hip.
Why is the hikite action more important in this technique than in basics? First, note that the attacking arm in this example does not have the benefit of a large amount of mass pushing into the target. The only thing that is really going into the target is the arm; not the shoulder, hip and other parts of the body that are usually involved when using a "normal" (forward shifting/stepping) pattern of attack. Because of this lesser effective mass going towards the target, we must rely on speed and timing more. The quick and forceful movement back on the pulling side of the torso helps propel the attacking arm towards the target. But, perhaps more importantly, it helps move your body out of harms way. This is an added benefit of the hikite action sometimes. Perhaps this is even more important than some other, more common ideas.
Another point to consider in this example technique is the use of the hips. As the left hip is moving in a large arch, the use of rotational force may be very important in this type of action. The pull of the arm may aid in the application of this rotational force, helping the hips move faster. But for control and efficiency, the pulling arm is not allowed to extend out from the body, as might have helped the rotational force further if that were our only goal. Generally, the more the hip moves backwards, the more the pull of that hand helps that action become larger, faster and more forceful.
Conclusion: Hikite can be helpful. But the goals should be understood, to be sure that we are training the proper points, instead of just mindlessly following what we are told.
*Please watch for more on the subjects of hikite and hip rotation in future articles.
Copyright © 1999, Jon Keeling
